Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Meeting Procedures Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Police Commission approves consent reports, holds closed session and limits disclosure
Summary
The San Francisco Police Commission voted 5-0 to receive and file the consent calendar, voted to convene a closed session under the city code, and later voted not to disclose closed-session deliberations except for specified non-privileged factual information.
Get email alerts on the Meeting Procedures Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The San Francisco Police Commission on May 21 voted unanimously to receive and file the items on its consent calendar, voted to go into closed session under the San Francisco Administrative Code, and later voted not to disclose deliberations from that closed session except for certain non-privileged factual information.
At the start of the meeting the commission approved the consent calendar by voice vote. The motion on the consent calendar was recorded as “Motion to receive and file.” The tally recorded at the meeting was five yes votes and no recorded opposition.
The commission then voted to convene a closed session under San Francisco Administrative Code Section 67.1(d). After returning to open session, the commission considered whether to disclose discussions held in closed session and approved a motion “to not disclose with the exception of non-privileged factual information on items 9a and 9b, which will be provided in the minutes.” That motion carried on a 5-0 vote as recorded at the meeting.
All three outcomes were recorded in the meeting minutes. The meeting transcript records the roll call and votes as the commission proceeded through the agenda.
Votes at a glance • Consent calendar (receive and file): Motion carried, 5-0 yes. • Vote to hold closed session (Admin. Code § 67.1(d)): Motion carried, 5-0 yes. • Vote on disclosure after closed session (motion not to disclose except specified non-privileged factual information on items 9a and 9b): Motion carried, 5-0 yes.
The commission did not identify named movers or seconders for the recorded motions in the public portion of the transcript; recorded roll-call results were entered into the record.
