Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Emergency Management Staffing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Alpena County delays hiring full‑time emergency manager after commissioners request more study
Summary
The board voted to pause filling the combined 9‑1‑1/emergency management position that had been proposed to run solely under county control after Montmorency County declined to partner; commissioners asked administration to study cost and alternatives.
The Alpena County Board of Commissioners voted to delay filling a proposed full‑time combined 9‑1‑1/emergency management position after several commissioners asked for more research into costs and partnership options.
Why it matters: County leaders had planned to hire a full‑time emergency manager after a proposed cost‑sharing arrangement with Montmorency County collapsed. Commissioners said the county would be asked to absorb about $45,000 of additional cost if it fills the position alone, and they want to review funding options and alternatives before committing.
What was proposed and why County staff and the public safety committee had recommended filling the emergency management/9‑1‑1 position without partnering with Montmorency County. Kim Elking, Alpena County’s emergency management director and 9‑1‑1 director, said the combined role has carried heavy responsibilities and that combining duties has been common practice for years.
Commissioner John Kozlowski, who pulled the item for discussion, said he was disappointed Montmorency decided not to share costs and expressed concern about the long‑term expense to Alpena County. He asked the board to pause the hiring and explore other options. "I would like to hold off temporarily until I can do some research and look at other options," he said.
Board action and vote A motion to hold off on filling the position while the commissioner conducts research was made and seconded. On roll call the board approved the delay; one commissioner voted no. Kim Elking told commissioners she would work with the board during the pause and help develop options for sustainable staffing.
What comes next Commissioners directed staff to gather additional information about funding sources and operational alternatives and to return with recommendations. Commissioners noted possible offsetting revenues and state or federal grants that could reduce local exposure.
Ending The board’s pause keeps the current staffing in place while the county explores cost‑sharing and funding alternatives; staff will report back with options for a measured path forward.
