Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission asks staff to solicit competitive proposals to manage Chinsagat Hill; multiple local groups offer plans
Summary
Historic preservation groups and private partners presented competing proposals for managing Chinsagat (Chinsengate/Chinsagat) Hill. The board asked staff to solicit formal proposals so city, county and nonprofits can be considered fairly.
The Board of County Commissioners on May 27 heard competing proposals for managing Chinsagat Hill, a state-owned historic site the county currently licenses from Florida.
Speakers at the meeting included representatives of Historic Hernando Preservation Society (HHPS), the Tampa Bay History Center (which manages the Manor House under agreement), city of Brooksville staff and private partners who offered hospitality and rental operating plans. HHPS and allied speakers pressed to keep the site open to the public seven days a week and emphasized grant‑seeking and volunteer capacity. City Manager Lisa Hendrickson told the board Brooksville’s council had not yet given staff direction on renewing the city’s license; Brooksville would consider the matter at a June 30 council budget meeting.
After hearing public presentations, the board directed staff to solicit competitive, written proposals for operating the Manor House/museum and retreat‑center village. Commissioners said any solicitation should allow the city to submit proposals and should preserve the existing museum arrangement with the Tampa Bay History Center unless the board decides otherwise. Staff also was asked to pause certain county capital work on site (ADA improvements) while proposals are solicited and evaluated.
Why it matters: Chinsagat Hill is a long‑standing historic attraction. The county currently pays for utilities, grounds maintenance and some preservation work; commissioners want a fair, transparent process to evaluate nonprofit and private proposals before shifting ongoing taxpayer obligations. The board did not transfer operation at the meeting but requested staff return with a formal solicitation and an analysis of current county operating costs to inform a selection process.
