Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Wildlife Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
State wildlife division outlines urban deer program, warns relocation is no longer an option because of CWD
Summary
Utah Division of Wildlife Resources advised Copperton officials that its urban deer program requires a no‑feeding ordinance and liability coverage; trap‑and‑relocate has been discontinued because of chronic wasting disease, leaving lethal removal as the primary management tool for enrolled communities.
Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (DWR) staff briefed the Town of Copperton council on the division’s mule deer population work and the state urban deer program on May 21, outlining program requirements, population goals and public‑health precautions related to chronic wasting disease (CWD).
Jason Robinson, a DWR wildlife biologist, said the larger mule‑deer management unit that includes Copperton carries a population objective of 8,800 deer; current DWR estimates place the unit at about 7,680 deer. Robinson said drought and a heavy winter contributed to the lower population estimate.
Rod Nielsen, the division’s urban deer biologist for the Central Region, explained eligibility and requirements for the DWR urban deer program. He said communities that wish to enroll generally must meet three conditions: (1) hold adequate liability insurance (the DWR asked for proof of $100,000 to $1,000,000 general liability coverage in their description), (2) pass a local no‑feeding ordinance for big game, and (3) meet a minimum population threshold (the rule calls for about 1,000 residents as a guideline, though staff indicated some flexibility when a community demonstrates willingness to participate).
Nielsen told the council that the division ended the trap‑and‑relocate option about seven years ago because of the discovery of CWD in Utah and low post‑relocation survivability (the division’s relocation study found roughly a 35% survival rate for relocated animals in past work). That leaves lethal removal as the primary removal method for enrolled communities. He described two commonly used lethal‑removal approaches: contractor archery programs and live trapping followed by euthanasia. He said anyone removing animals through the program must test carcasses for CWD; if a test returns positive the division’s current recommendation is to destroy the animal and incinerate remains to avoid potential spread.
Nielsen also provided operational details: live trapping uses clover‑trap cages; deer in good condition are processed and recommended for donation first to local residents, then to a donation list if needed. The division collects submandibular lymph nodes weekly for CWD testing and expects communities to turn tissue samples in promptly. He said testing reliability depends on carcass condition and that carcasses left in the sun for days may not be testable.
On vehicle collisions and carcass pickup, DWR staff reported 27 deer carcasses were picked up in and around Copperton from 2012 through 2025 (67 if a related U‑11 corridor is included). The division operates a valleywide carcass pickup system and provided a front‑office number for service requests: (801) 491‑5678 (8 a.m.–5 p.m., Monday–Friday).
Why it matters: Copperton has a visible and established urban deer presence; the DWR briefing clarified eligibility, costs and biosecurity requirements for any community considering enrollment in the state urban deer program. The key change — removal of trap‑and‑relocate because of CWD — narrows management options and creates testing and disposal requirements for any community that proceeds.
