Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Homelessness topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City Council renews homelessness emergency and orders 30-day review of impacts
Summary
The Los Angeles City Council voted 13-1 to renew a local state of emergency on homelessness and adopted an amendment requiring city staff to produce reports and recommendations within 30 days on how to preserve interim housing sites, payments and contracting if the emergency ends.
The Los Angeles City Council voted 13-1 on a renewed emergency declaration addressing homelessness and adopted an amendment requiring rapid staff analysis of potential impacts if the emergency expires.
Council members approved the underlying emergency declaration (item 22) as amended after a prolonged discussion about whether the city has folded emergency measures into routine operations. The amendment, introduced by Council member Blumenfield and adopted as amended, instructs the Chief Legislative Analyst, the Chief Administrative Officer and the City Attorney to develop recommendations within 30 days for how to preserve interim housing sites on city property and ensure timely payment to service providers should the emergency lapse.
Why it matters: The emergency declaration has governed the city’s ability to use certain city properties and expedite contracting related to interim housing and other homelessness responses. Council members who pressed to end the emergency said the city should resume ordinary governance if normal departmental operations can carry out the work; other members said a short extension would preserve continuity while officials produce implementation guidance.
Council member McOsker opened the debate by pressing for reconsideration of the renewal and calling for a fuller discussion of the ordinance’s practical effects. "We've been in this for 2 and a half years," he said, noting the city’s extended use of emergency authorities and urging clarity about what would change if the declaration ended.
John Wickham of the Office of the Chief Legislative Analyst told the council that the administrative code (Los Angeles Administrative Code §8.33) gives the council the power either to terminate an emergency or to renew it and that the council may determine when the emergency work has been incorporated into normal city functions. Wickham also said some budget and administrative steps taken this year — including formation of a consolidated homelessness bureau — were intended to move work into regular departmental practice.
Several council members, including Nithya Raman and Padilla, said they supported the amendment requiring short-timed guidance to minimize disruptions. Raman said the city must "move out of a state of emergency response and move into a systemic response to this issue," while others warned that abrupt termination could interrupt payments to motel operators and the continued use of recreation and parks sites without additional approvals.
Council member Yaroslavsky raised a procedural point: if the amendment passed but the underlying declaration failed, the amendment’s protections would not take effect; she urged that the mitigation steps be requested on a parallel track to avoid losing protections.
The council first granted a motion to reconsider the item (moved by Council member McOsker and seconded by Council member Hernandez); that motion passed 14-0. After debate the council approved amendment 22a as amended (the amendment narrows and adds reporting instructions and sets a 30-day recovery/review timeline), which passed 13 ayes, 1 no. The final vote on item 22 as amended was 13 ayes, 1 no.
Details and next steps: The amendment directs the CLA, CAO and City Attorney to report back within 30 days with recommendations to preserve use of city properties for interim housing, to outline how payments to providers would be handled if the emergency ends, and to identify any actions the Council should take to prevent service disruption. Councilmembers said they expect further committee reports and possible follow-up motions; several urged that the CLA and other staff provide specific operational answers on contracting, payment timing and Rec and Parks approvals.
Vote tally: item 22 as amended — 13 ayes, 1 no.
The council’s action keeps the emergency in place for the current renewal period while forcing a faster staff review intended to allow the council to act with more detailed operational information in the near term.
