Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Local Government topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

CB2 adopts amended agenda, approves minutes and votes on human services and multiple landmarks items

3468776 · May 23, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At its May full board meeting Manhattan Community Board 2 adopted an amended agenda, approved April minutes and passed resolutions from the Human Services and Landmarks committees addressing rat abatement, monitoring Beth Israel closure impacts and multiple certificate‑of‑appropriateness matters; some votes drew public dissent.

Manhattan Community Board 2 unanimously adopted an amended agenda and approved the April full board minutes at its May meeting, then considered committee resolutions from Human Services and Landmarks. The board approved two Human Services resolutions and multiple Landmarks Committee recommendations on individual properties, while several members recorded opposition or abstentions on specific items.

The board approved a Human Services Committee omnibus package that included a resolution urging the city to prioritize direct rodent‑abatement treatment — specifically advocating city expense for tree‑pit treatment rather than fines for property owners who comply with sanitation rules — and a separate resolution calling for ongoing monitoring and transparent reporting on effects of the Mount Sinai Beth Israel closure on patient volumes and emergency care at neighboring Northwell Greenwich Village Hospital. During the full‑board vote, board member Kean Berger said he voted against the rodent‑abatement resolution but in favor of the Beth Israel monitoring resolution.

Landmarks committees presented multiple applications for review; the full board voted on recommendations from both Landmarks 1 and Landmarks 2. Actions recorded in the meeting packet and discussed on the floor included approvals of careful facade restorations and denials of design elements judged incompatible with the historic district. One of the more contested items was 142 Green Street, an application that the landmarks committee recommended for careful facade restoration but that some speakers and board members opposed because the proposal converts five joint live/work units into a single‑family residence, a change critics said would eliminate multiple housing units. Several board members who spoke during debate — including Susan Wittenberg, Sean Sweeney, Janine Kiley and Arturo Fernandez — said they would vote against the 142 Green Street recommendation on principle because of the loss of housing.

Other Landmarks items the board addressed included 247 Bleecker Street (committee denied a proposed pink repaint and requested the applicant return with a historically appropriate color), approvals of facade restorations at several properties, and denials of proposed rooftop additions or other elements that the committee judged unsuitable to the historic district. The board took up Landmarks 1 items in part as a block and returned to contested items for separate consideration.

The meeting record shows named opposition, abstentions and recusal notations attached to particular items; where members publicly stated their intent, those positions were recorded in the full‑board vote. The board did not read any new statutes or issue enforcement orders during the meeting; actions were committee recommendations carried or rejected by full‑board vote.

Clarifying details recorded during the session include that the Human Services committee had originally met without quorum and forwarded two resolutions to the full board; that Landmarks 1 and Landmarks 2 presented multiple discrete applications (addresses discussed in committee recommendations included 142 Green Street, 247 Bleecker Street, 160 West 10th Street, and others listed below); and that the board adoption of the amended agenda and approval of minutes were completed before committee votes.

The board package and the audio record show repeated reminders from the chair about voting procedure and options (in favor, opposed, abstain, recuse), and Emma Smith, board secretary, logged individual names who spoke or whose votes were recorded for specific contested items.

Votes at a glance (selected items recorded in the meeting packet and discussed on the floor): - Adopt amended agenda — adopted by the full board; no specific roll‑call objections recorded. - Approve April full board minutes — approved. - Human Services 1: Resolution urging prioritized city‑funded tree‑pit treatment and caution about fines for complying property owners — approved by full board; some members expressed opposition to the allocation of city resources for this program. - Human Services 2: Resolution requesting monitoring and transparent reporting of the impact of Mount Sinai Beth Israel's closure on patient volumes and emergency care at Northwell Greenwich Village Hospital — approved. - Landmarks 1 (multiple properties): Committee recommendations on individual properties (examples discussed in committee and adopted/recorded by the full board include approvals for careful facade restoration at 142 Green Street with caveats for penthouse modification, denial of a proposed pink repaint and signage at 247 Bleecker Street, approval of certain rooftop and rear modifications at 160 West 10th Street, and other case‑by‑case approvals/denials) — adopted by full board with recorded dissents on specific items. - Landmarks 2 (multiple properties): Committee recommendations on several additional addresses (e.g., 115 Mercer Street, 67 Gansevoort Street, 62 Prince Street, 57 Christopher Street, and others) — adopted as presented with committee conditions where noted.

Board members and committee chairs encouraged members and the public to consult the full meeting packet for itemized language; the packet contains the full text of each committee resolution and the committee rationale for approvals and denials.