Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Measure A Implementation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Staff outlines how Measure A amendments would affect general-plan amendments; commission asks for clarifications
Summary
Planning staff described a proposed general-plan amendment to implement Measure A, explaining which land-use changes would require voter approval and how the measure would affect applications submitted after March 2024. Commissioners sought clarification about vested rights and the handling of existing approvals.
Planning staff presented a proposed general-plan amendment intended to implement Measure A, a voter-approved measure from 2024, and explained the administrative and procedural effects the measure would have on future land-use redesignations in unincorporated San Benito County.
According to staff, the draft amendments define which redesignations of land use categories (for example, changes involving agricultural, rural or rangeland designations) would require voter approval under Measure A. Staff explained the proposed amendments identify types of general-plan changes that would remain administrative versus those that would trigger a voter election. Staff also described an effect date tied to the county—s certification process and said the proposed language is meant to clarify how applications received after March 2024 will be handled.
Commissioners and members of the public asked whether previously approved entitlements and vested rights would be stripped if the measure is implemented. Planning staff responded that existing approvals and vested rights would continue and would not be retroactively canceled by the amendment; staff said projects already approved or vested prior to the effective date would retain their rights.
Commissioners also discussed logistics and timelines for ballot placement and the applicant responsibilities for paying election costs; staff said applicants would likely be responsible for certain election-related costs and that specific filing deadlines and election dates are reflected in the staff presentation. Public commenters raised concerns about how the measure would affect active commercial projects and requested clarity on how the county would notify affected property owners.
The item was presented for commission discussion and public comment. No final adoption occurred at the commission hearing; staff and commissioners agreed further clarifications and potential edits would be considered before any recommendation to the Board of Supervisors.
