Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Administrative Policy Pool Variances topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

ADR staff to share pool/amenity variance precedents; full committee to review before recommending code changes

3428560 · May 20, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The ADR discussed a staff compilation of pool and outdoor-amenity variance approvals since 2020 and agreed to have staff circulate the data to all ADR members and return the topic for full-committee consideration; potential code changes (for on-grade pools, sports courts and patios) were proposed for future discussion.

Ross staff presented research of pool and landscape-amenity variances approved since 2020 and asked the ADR whether it preferred to receive the analysis now or wait until a full committee was present. Roberta and Alex explained the research compares Ross decisions with neighboring towns and shows inconsistencies in how pools, sports courts and patios have been treated.

Why it matters: Staff said the research could inform whether the town should amend its code or adjust administrative processes so some types of on-grade pools or sports courts no longer require variances (for example, neighboring jurisdictions allow a 10-foot setback or do not regulate below-ground pools). ADR members preferred a full-committee discussion and asked staff to circulate the compiled data by email so all members can review before a decision.

Points raised and next steps Roberta (staff) said the research aims to determine whether to change process or code so that certain pools or sports courts would not require variances, and to consider whether in-ground pools or on-grade amenities should be treated differently than elevated features. ADR members recommended staff email the materials to all ADR members and then schedule the full discussion when all five members can attend. Staff agreed to do so; the item was tabled pending full-committee discussion.

Outcome: Staff will circulate the compiled variance data to the full ADR and return the item for discussion with the complete committee; members suggested the research include sports courts, patios, fireplaces and other landscape features that the code treats as structures when placed in setbacks.