Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zma2023 17 Rezone Weaver River topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission backs rezoning to R‑115 with conditions, asks developer to escrow funds and protect river buffer
Summary
The planning commission voted unanimously to recommend rezoning about 47.56 acres near the Weaver River from A‑2 to R‑115, contingent on a development agreement that includes sewer annexation, flood‑plain protections, a donated 300‑foot river buffer for parkland, and escrowing funds for a proposed emergency egress.
The Western Weber Planning Commission on Jan. 9 voted unanimously to forward a positive recommendation to the county commission to rezone roughly 47.56 acres at about 500 North and 3600 West from A‑2 to R‑115, subject to a development agreement and several conditions intended to protect riverfront open space, manage utilities and ensure public safety.
Acting Planning Director Charlie reviewed the staff report and a developer concept plan. He told commissioners the applicant proposes medium large‑lot residential development under R‑115 standards, has submitted civil plans now in second review, and is voluntarily offering a 300‑foot buffer along the Weaver River to be donated to the park district — roughly 35 acres of open space — that staff expects to be improved with trails, benches, parking, restrooms and water refill stations.
A central issue at the hearing was emergency access. County code limits the number of homes that may be served by a dead‑end road; developers may exceed basic thresholds only if they provide approved emergency egress. The applicant proposed to finance and escrow a temporary emergency egress (a 20‑foot improved travel surface sufficient for fire apparatus) while working to secure rights through neighboring parcels for a long‑term connection. Staff recommended limiting initial construction to no more than 14 new homes until an emergency egress is installed; the recommended development agreement included triggers and timing for escalation of permitted homes if the egress is documented and built.
Staff also noted the need for sewer infrastructure and a lift station shown in the county sewer master plan; the applicant indicated willingness to oversize sewer lines and install a lift station if required. Charlie said floodplain mapping and wetlands inventory will be reviewed during subdivision and development agreement drafting; staff recommended that no development occur within identified floodplain areas and that the donated river buffer remain as parkland.
After public comment from nearby landowners raising concerns about flooding, road impacts and private property effects, the planning commission moved to forward a positive recommendation to the county commission with staff’s conditions plus an added clause that utilities be built to future build‑out sizes; a pioneering agreement (to cover upsizing costs only) may be included to allow the developer to be reimbursed for upsizing, but not to shift initial installation costs for utilities.
Commissioners McCormack, Andreotti, Romero, Wickerton, Neville, Collins and the chair voted in favor; the motion passed unanimously. The county commission will receive the planning commission’s recommendation and consider the rezone and development agreement in a later public hearing.
