Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the County Budget And Administration topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Marathon County supervisors set June meeting, request budget-impact updates
Summary
The Marathon County Board of Supervisors set its next meeting for June 24, scheduled the county auditor for July 22, asked staff to report back on closed-session negotiation strategy and self-insurance timelines, and requested analysis of federal and state budget impacts on county agencies.
The Marathon County Board of Supervisors set its next regular meeting for June 24 and directed staff to report back on negotiation strategy discussed in closed session, the board chair said. The board was also told the county auditor is scheduled to be present July 22, and that a working capital policy will be on the June agenda.
The chair said staff should prepare an update on where the county stands on self-insured timelines and that the board should get an analysis of how recent federal and state budget decisions might affect the county’s budget for the current and future fiscal years. The chair noted uncertainty about the impacts but said the county could be affected through agencies including North Central Health Care, the Marathon County Health Department, and county social services.
Supervisor Lemmer moved to adjourn; Supervisor Poole seconded. The motion carried and the meeting was adjourned.
Why it matters: Board direction on reporting and scheduling will determine what information supervisors have before budgeting decisions. The requested updates — on self-insurance timelines and on the effects of federal and state budget actions — could influence decisions that affect county-operated health services and social programs.
What was said and next steps: The board’s June 24 agenda is expected to include the working capital policy and other items the chair described as a "full agenda." The chair and staff said the auditor will be at the July 22 meeting. Staff were assigned to provide a report back on negotiation strategy from the closed session and to compile information about self-insurance timelines. The chair requested a separate analysis of how federal and state budget outcomes could affect county departments and partner agencies; no timeline for that analysis was specified in the record.
No formal votes on policy or budget items were taken during the portion of the meeting recorded here; the only formal action recorded in this segment was the motion to adjourn.
For clarity: Remarks about negotiation strategy were made in reference to a matter discussed in closed session; details of that negotiation were not disclosed in the public portion of the meeting. The chair described potential affected agencies but did not quantify fiscal impacts in this discussion.
