Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Textbooks Curriculum topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board reviews McGraw Hill curriculum charges and a credit memo; trustees ask for clearer invoice backup
Summary
Trustees examined multi-year math curriculum charges to McGraw Hill, noted a credit memo and asked why invoices and line-item descriptions were truncated on the claims docket; staff said the district is mid-contract with three years remaining and will supply clearer invoices.
At the June 5 work session trustees scrutinized the claims docket entries for a multi-year McGraw Hill math curriculum contract and questioned a credit memo and line-item descriptions. Board members said the claim docket text was truncated and requested clearer invoice backup.
Staff explained the district is in a multi-year contract with McGraw Hill (consumable workbooks and program materials) and that three years remain on the agreement. The packet included a credit memo for a returned or short-shipped order; staff told trustees consumables are normally delivered to schools before the start of the school year and that the books for 2025–26 had been distributed to buildings. Trustees repeatedly asked why the claim docket short descriptions did not make clear the invoice purpose and where the credit was applied.
In the meeting the board identified specific line-item references the trustees could not reconcile on the docket. One trustee pointed the docket's line for the math materials at approximately $68,571 per school and noted a credit of about $83,307; staff said they would reconcile line-item invoices and update the packet. Trustees asked that future claim dockets include adequate descriptions or accompanying invoices so the board could see deliverables and credits without needing to chase supporting documents.
Ending: Administration said it would post clearer invoice copies and reconcile the credit memo before the consent agenda is considered at the next regular meeting.
