Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Policy Cellphones topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cannon County board weighs all‑day cell‑phone ban vs. instructional‑time rule; decision set for later this month
Summary
Board members discussed two draft policies — a full‑day student phone ban and a narrower ban limited to instructional time — heard evidence from districts that tightened rules and directed principals to draft procedures; the board must choose a policy before the school year under new state requirements.
CANNON COUNTY, Tenn. — The Cannon County Board of Education spent the longest portion of its June 10 workshop debating stricter rules for student cell phones, weighing a district‑wide, all‑day ban against a more limited rule that would prohibit phones during instructional time only.
Board members reviewed two draft policies: Policy A would require phones to be secured and unavailable for students for the full school day, including lunch and passing periods; Policy B would restrict phone use during instructional time but allow phones at lunch and between classes. Board members were told a state law requires phones not be used during instruction, but local policy determines the degree of restriction and enforcement.
Why it matters: Administrators and principals told the board they see phones linked to classroom distractions, hallway misconduct and social‑media conflicts. Several board members cited experiences in other Tennessee districts where stricter rules reduced disciplinary incidents and improved classroom focus.
What board members heard - Board members cited Huntington and Warren County examples where administrators reported discipline and bullying incidents dropped after strict enforcement; one principal described students as “allowed to be kids again.” - Concerns raised included logistical issues at dismissal, the potential for students to conceal burning/burner phones, parent communication in emergencies, and staff enforcement. Several speakers recommended clear, enforceable procedures and parental communication plans before adopting a stricter rule. - Practical options discussed included Yondr‑style lock bags or magnetized pouches, locking cabinets at the start of the day, or a policy that returns phones to students at day’s end with graduated disciplinary consequences for violations.
Board direction and next steps - The board asked principals and central office staff to draft procedures (collection/return, handling emergencies, parent notification and enforcement steps) tied to the chosen policy. - The board must adopt a policy this month so it is in place for the upcoming school year; members planned to finalize language and procedures at the next meeting or a special call. Several board members favored a policy with “teeth” and explicit, escalating consequences for repeated violations.
Quotations from the meeting - "Phones cannot be out," said Bonnie (staff member), summarizing how state rules and local policy interact. - Board members recounted other districts’ experiences: one principal said discipline problems “1000%” improved after removing phones from students during the school day.
Discussion vs. decision - The workshop produced detailed discussion and direction to staff, but no final board vote. Principals will develop implementation procedures and the board will decide on either Policy A or Policy B before the start of the next school year.
Potential impacts - Board members said the middle school likely would see the greatest immediate effect if the district adopts stricter rules. The board also discussed parental concerns and liability; staff indicated they have researched legal considerations and believe policies that are clearly written and communicated are defensible.
