Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Traffic topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council backs comprehensive‑plan amendment and PUD rezoning at Lafayette Drive and South Illinois despite neighborhood traffic concerns
Summary
The council approved on reading a comprehensive‑plan amendment and rezoning for roughly 3.79 acres at Lafayette Drive and South Illinois to permit a UB2 PUD development; residents and several council members raised traffic, sight‑distance and neighborhood cut‑through concerns.
Oak Ridge City Council on first reading approved two related ordinances to change the land‑use designation and rezone about 3.79 acres at the corner of Lafayette Drive and South Illinois Avenue from single‑family residential (R1) to UB2 with a Planned Unit Development overlay (UB2PUD). The planning commission recommended approval.
The zoning change accompanies a preliminary master plan for a small shopping‑center style development. City staff and the planning commission included conditions related to site access, screening and sidewalks that became part of the PUD preliminary approval.
Residents and several council members raised traffic and safety concerns. Acting city engineer Brian Mills and other engineering staff said they had not required a traffic‑impact study but were discussing access design (right‑in/right‑out vs. full access) with the developer and Tennessee Department of Transportation (TDOT). Mills said the city favored intersection improvements such as deceleration and acceleration lanes where feasible, but expressed concern about sight distance on the South Illinois approach down a hill.
Council member (identified in the transcript as) Smith and other speakers described the Lafayette–Illinois–Scarborough Road area as a complex intersection with heavy traffic and limited sight distance when vehicles speed downhill. Residents warned that allowing commercial access could drive customers down Woodland Terrace and Paris Lane—small residential streets—not designed for increased cut‑through traffic.
Rick Chen, representing the property owners, said the applicant has a prior full‑access right for the corner dating to 1983 and told council the development team will work with TDOT and the city to modify access details; he said if TDOT declines right‑in/right‑out access, that movement will not be installed. Several residents objected to commercial development on land they said had been treated as a residential buffer in earlier corridor planning.
Outcome: Council approved both the comprehensive‑plan amendment and the rezoning on first reading. The vote on the comprehensive‑plan amendment carried on reading by roll call; the rezoning passed on reading with a 4–2 recorded vote. Council and staff directed further work with engineering and TDOT on access design, sight distance and potential traffic‑mitigation measures; planning conditions accompanying the PUD require specific access and screening measures to be addressed in later design phases.
Why it matters: The change converts a residential corner into commercial zoning with a PUD overlay that will govern site‑specific design details. Council and staff emphasized that final approvals and construction will require additional engineering review, potential traffic modifications and TDOT sign‑off on state‑route access.
