Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Right Of Way Reduction topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee approves reduction of right-of-way with conditions; staff to seek appraisal and finalize documents

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Real Estate Committee voted to approve a reduction in a 90-foot right-of-way as indicated, subject to conditions. Staff and the committee discussed surveying, easements for utilities and storm lines, appraisal methods, and DEC/Army Corps wetland delineation issues.

The Real Estate Committee found that a proposed reduction of a 90-foot right-of-way was acceptable with appropriate conditions and voted to proceed, subject to further documentation and conditions.

City staff and committee members discussed technical requirements before conveyance: preparing meets-and-bounds by surveyor Bill Thompson; reserving easements for utilities, including a storm line; and marking or relocating dry utilities such as gas and electric if necessary. City staff noted a signed wetland delineation on file and that previous mitigation plans had been renewed, so the parcel under discussion was not expected to contain conveyance-limiting regulated wetlands.

Committee members discussed how to determine fair consideration for any conveyance. Options discussed included hiring a certified appraiser to use standard valuation methods, obtaining an assessor's valuation, and comparing per-square-foot assessed values for adjacent parcels. Staff suggested blending a private appraisal and a public-sector estimate to reach a fair number. Bill Thompson was assigned to prepare the meets-and-bounds and acreage information to support appraisal work.

A committee member moved that the reduction of the right-of-way as indicated, with appropriate conditions, was acceptable; members responded in the affirmative and the motion passed by voice vote in the recorded excerpt.

Next steps recorded in the discussion include: staff will prepare meets-and-bounds and conveyance documents; commission and staff will determine appraisal methodology (private appraiser, assessor data, or blended approach); and staff will return draft documents and valuation for committee review.