Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget And Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Brownsville reviews quarterly finances and approves bond‑planning resolutions amid state legislative uncertainty
Summary
The city acknowledged unaudited second‑quarter financials and approved resolutions to preserve the option to reimburse capital costs and to publish intent to issue certificates of obligation up to $150 million if needed, while staff said final decisions will depend on pending state legislation.
The Brownsville City Commission on May 20 acknowledged the city’s unaudited financial statements for the second quarter ended March 31, heard an overview of key revenue and portfolio figures, and approved two resolutions aimed at preserving the city’s ability to finance capital projects while state legislative proposals remain unsettled.
Interim Financial Director Steven Muse presented the report and said general fund revenues and transfers year‑to‑date were $75.3 million (March’s sales tax receipts, received after the packet, increased the comparable receipt total to about $79 million). Muse told commissioners the city’s unassigned fund balance was $43.9 million and the portfolio’s weighted average yield was 3.85 percent (4.10 percent excluding deposit balances), with a weighted average maturity of 48 days.
To preserve financing options if the Texas Legislature restricts bonding authority, the commission approved a non‑binding "official intent to reimburse" resolution authorizing staff to use short‑term cash if needed and later reimburse certain capital expenditures with tax‑exempt obligations. The commission also approved a second resolution to publish notice of intent to issue certificates of obligation (COs) in an amount not to exceed $150 million as a contingency plan (staff labeled this plan B), subject to changing circumstances in Austin.
Financial adviser Isaiah Huerta (Estrada Hinojosa) presented illustrations showing how an issuance could be structured and that, under certain assumptions and use of existing debt‑service reserves, a $100 million issuance could be accommodated without increasing the city’s tax rate and a $150 million issuance could require about a three‑cent increase in the illustrative tax rate. Huerta emphasized the numbers were preliminary and contingent on market conditions and legislative outcomes.
Why it matters: city staff said delaying action could narrow or eliminate the city's ability to issue debt on a timetable that matches grant requirements and capital project schedules. Commissioners and staff stressed the steps taken are optional and non‑binding: staff said if the Legislature acts favorably, or the city decides against issuance, the city will not proceed.
Votes and next steps: The commission acknowledged the financial report and approved both resolutions in separate votes. Staff said a definitive financing decision would occur after the Legislature’s actions are clear and that any sale would follow required publication and public‑notice steps.
Ending: The resolutions preserve the city’s timing options for capital projects including the public safety complex design, trail and transit matches, and airport and runway projects, while staff said they will keep the commission informed as the legislative picture evolves.
