Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Waste Management topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee amends landfill fee: quarterly grants, lower late fee, cost placed on haulers rather than landfills

3638870 ยท May 30, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The committee approved an amendment adjusting a proposed $3.50-per-ton fee on solid waste: municipalities may claim grant reimbursements quarterly, late fees are reduced from $25,000 to $1,000 per day, and the requirement to remit is shifted from landfill operators to haulers/transporters.

The Senate Finance Committee approved an amendment to proposed fees on municipal solid waste that changes how revenue is collected and distributed and reduces penalty amounts.

A committee member explained the amendment addresses three concerns with the underlying proposal for a $3.50-per-ton fee on solid waste entering landfills and waste-to-energy facilities. First, municipalities would be able to apply quarterly for grant reimbursements so they would not have to carry the full annual cost on their books for longer periods. Second, the late-payment penalty for a facility would be reduced from $25,000 per day to $1,000 per day. Third, the amendment changes the remittance structure so the haulers (generators/transporters) rather than the landfill operators would make the payments to the facility; the facilities would then aggregate funds and submit them quarterly for distribution.

The sponsor said the original proposal risked imposing costs on landfill operators who have long-term contracts and could not pass through fees, and that stakeholders warned some operators could lose more than $2,000,000 a year under the previous structure. The amendment is intended to place the statutory obligation on the generator/hauler and to mirror how other tax collections (for example, rooms and meals) are handled.

The committee approved the amendment by voice vote and moved on to other items.

Ending: The amendment was approved and the committee left one section on hold to finish final language in negotiation.