Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Privacy And Data Protection topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee advances bill to protect genetic material and sensitive autism‑related data
Summary
AB 589 would restrict sale and unauthorized use of genetic material and certain personal data related to autism, with specified exceptions for subpoenas, medical treatment and criminal investigations; the committee passed the bill with several members reserving the right to change their floor votes.
Get email alerts on the Privacy And Data Protection topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
CARSON CITY — The Senate Committee on Government Affairs voted to pass Assembly Bill 589, a privacy bill that would establish protections for certain personal information and genetic material and limit disclosure or sale absent informed consent, while including statutory exceptions for medical treatment and law enforcement subpoenas.
Speaker Steve Yeager (Assembly District 9) presented the bill and framed it as an effort to protect Nevadans from unauthorized use or sale of highly sensitive data, including autism‑related records and DNA. Yeager cited recent national developments — a federal data collection effort that he said raised concerns and the bankruptcy proceedings involving a major consumer genetic testing company — as reasons the state should enshrine consumer protections.
“The people in our state are looking for us to take action. That’s what Assembly Bill 589 does,” Yeager said during his presentation, arguing the state must ensure informed consent before private health or genetic information is shared or sold.
Members asked about exceptions during the hearing. Senator Krasner raised the question of criminal‑justice uses such as evidence from DNA kits; Yeager and staff said the bill includes exceptions where disclosure is required by subpoena or is necessary to support medical treatment. The presenter emphasized that the bill’s focus is preventing sale or use of data without a person’s knowledge.
There were no in‑person supporters or opponents who spoke during the committee portion of the hearing. On a committee vote in the work session, Senator Daley moved to do pass AB 589 and Vice Chair Orangewell seconded; the motion carried unanimously, though several members announced they reserved the right to change their votes before floor consideration.
The bill’s provisions and any implementing regulations will be considered further as AB 589 proceeds to the Senate floor.

