Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Budget Fy26 topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

School Committee votes to accept mayor’s reduced FY2026 budget after hour-long debate

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After presentations and questions, the committee voted to match the mayor’s $95,962,440 FY2026 budget, accepting suggested cuts to central administration and other lines; members debated trade-offs for student-facing services.

Superintendent Dr. Crowley presented the School Committee’s FY2026 budget and summarized educational priorities — reading specialists, early college expansion, arts and extracurriculars — that the proposed budget sought to sustain. He warned that the Superintendent’s office and principals would need to prioritize if reductions were required.

Committee members and the public discussed a $440,000 discrepancy between the school committee’s adopted number and the mayor’s budget submitted to the city council. The differences prompted detailed discussion of possible reductions: an assistant superintendent position (administrative), a school culture specialist at the high school, ML (multilingual) paraprofessional lines, and substitute-teacher funding among other lines. Dr. Crowley emphasized that cuts would be difficult and could affect student-facing initiatives.

After discussion the committee moved to adopt the mayor’s budget number; a motion to adjust the school department appropriation to $95,962,440 (the mayor’s submission) with administration-recommended cuts passed on a voice/roll call vote (all in favor; recorded as seven ayes). Committee members urged the public to contact city councilors ahead of the council’s June 9 public hearing and noted possible future conversations about restoring positions depending on council action or supplemental funding.

The committee also handled procedural motions earlier in the meeting — taking the Goodyear presentation out of order, returning to regular order, approving minutes and recording a public commenter’s remarks as a public document — all of which passed by voice vote.