Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Special Events Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lake Elsinore council approves new special-events procedures after split vote
Summary
The Lake Elsinore City Council voted 3-2 to adopt a new special-events procedure after a debate over whether the rules will deter neighborhood or nonprofit organizers or protect taxpayers and public safety.
The Lake Elsinore City Council on Tuesday adopted new special-events procedures in a 3-2 vote after members debated whether the rules would discourage grassroots organizers or fairly protect taxpayer and public-safety resources.
The procedures, presented after a rewrite by the city attorney, create a formal application and review path for events held within the city. Supporters said the rules provide clarity, accountability and public-safety safeguards; opponents said the procedures risk “chilling” modest neighborhood or nonprofit events.
Councilwoman Johnson, who moved approval, said she had "pushed to have it brought back at this meeting" to give event organizers "a foundation and a plan and stability." Johnson said the procedures aim to ensure fiscal responsibility and consistent safety oversight rather than ad hoc handling.
Council Member Sheridan announced he would vote no, saying the procedures as written could dissuade newcomers and small organizers: "I don't wanna dissuade people who move into our area and wanna do events in the area, from doing so because they look at the procedure and say, wow, that's a lot." Sheridan also urged a clearer distinction between for-profit and nonprofit events.
Councilman Munoz said he found some of Sheridan's points "very cogent" and raised concern that the policy appeared to shift the onus for public-safety estimates to the sheriff's office rather than retaining city accountability: "I do have concerns... it seems like the policy doesn't seem to put any of the onus with the city." Munoz withdrew his second on the matter and asked to see related ordinance language before fully backing the policy.
Mayor Pro Tem McGee said the procedure includes a backstop if staff and applicants cannot agree: "That is the time when the council's subcommittee can ask the question, why do we have 8 motor patrol officers during the Canyon Hills parade? Seems like a little much to me." He said the subcommittee review is intended to resolve disputed staffing and safety allocations.
Council members also noted that the city attorney, identified in the meeting as Dave Mann, is drafting rewritten ordinances (special events and parade ordinances) and that the procedures could be revisited after those ordinances are considered. The procedures in the adopted form include a resubmittal step; if staff and an applicant cannot reach agreement after a second resubmittal, the matter is referred to a council subcommittee for resolution, the council discussed.
Votes at a glance: The council approved the city consent calendar items 2–21 with item 14 considered separately (the transcript does not specify the vote tally for the omnibus consent motion). Item 14, the special-events procedure, passed 3-2. The successor agency consent calendar items 22–28 were approved on a separate motion that carried 5-0 before the council adjourned.
What happens next: The city attorney is expected to bring revised ordinances for council consideration consistent with the procedures. Council members asked staff to track public-safety staffing estimates, potential differential standards for for-profit versus nonprofit events, and any fiscal impacts on the general fund.
