Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Legislation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public employee groups urge PEBP board to support AB188 and warn against Nevada Health Authority changes
Summary
Public commenters and the PEBP executive officer discussed Assembly Bill 188 (restoring retiree health subsidies) and proposed Nevada Health Authority legislation, raising concerns about fiscal notes and board authority.
Public commenters representing faculty and retiree groups urged the Public Employees Benefits Program (PEBP) board to support Assembly Bill 188, which would restore retiree health subsidies for employees hired on or after Jan. 1, 2012, and raised concerns about proposed Nevada Health Authority legislation that they say would reduce the board—s independence.
Why it matters: AB188 would change eligibility for retiree subsidies and could increase the plan—s long-term OPEB liability; the Nevada Health Authority bills would reorganize state benefits oversight and, according to commenters, could remove the board's current selection and fiduciary authority.
Kent Ervin of the Nevada Faculty Alliance told the board, "We urge your support of AB188 as amended, restoration of Public Employees Benefits Program retiree health benefits for post 2011 state hires." Doug Unger, acting president of the UNLV chapter of the Nevada Faculty Alliance, told the board AB188 "would restore retiree health care subsidies for post-2011 retirees" and said the projected PEBP encumbrance would have an "insignificant impact stretched out over time." Terrillaird, executive director of ARRILAIRD (Retired Public Employees of Nevada), said his membership opposes removal of the board's authority and favors amendments to preserve the PEBP board's independence.
Executive Officer Celestina Glover briefed the board on the agency—s legislative tracking. Regarding AB188 she said the bill "allows for those members who were hired on 01/01/2012 or later to receive a subsidy should they decide to enroll in the PEP plan at retirement." Glover said Seigel's initial actuarial work projects a 12.26% increase in OPEB liability in the first year (she characterized that as roughly $179 million) and that PEBP has prepared a fiscal note reflecting expected administrative costs, including roughly $1 million for staffing and an initial estimate of about $1.1 million for first-year claims on an assumed 73 new retirees. She said future biennium estimates include additional multi‑million dollar amounts as enrollment grows and that those numbers will be updated if the bill passes and enrollment materializes.
Commenters and several board members expressed concern about Senate Bill 494 (the Nevada Health Authority draft discussed at the meeting). Doug Unger and others said the first draft would "strip the board of most of its independence and authority" and urged preserving the board—s statutory selection and approval roles. Board member Michelle Kelly said she is "concerned" the bill "takes away the neutrality of the PEBP board," noting the board—s role in employee compensation and retention.
Board action: The board did not take a formal position on AB188 or the Nevada Health Authority bills at this meeting. Glover said staff will continue to update the board and provide fiscal analyses and that the board may be convened for special meetings if needed.
Looking ahead: Glover said PEBP is providing requested fiscal detail to LCB staff and bill sponsors as amendments are proposed, and she will report back at the July meeting or sooner if circumstances require.
