Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Short Term Rentals topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Vendor demonstrates short‑term rental compliance tool to Weber County officials
Summary
A representative from Brandycus House Compliance demonstrated software that maps unincorporated Weber County boundaries and scrapes short‑term rental listings across major platforms, showing county-specific dashboards and login options.
Brandy, a representative of Brandycus House Compliance, told Weber County officials that the company’s host‑compliance software has mapped jurisdiction boundaries for unincorporated Weber County and collects short‑term rental listings from online platforms.
"Hello, Weber County. This is Brandy from Brandycus House Compliance. I'm just gonna talk to you really quickly about what we have going on in the host compliance system for you all right now," Brandy said during the presentation. She described a dashboard that pulls listings for rentals of less than 30 days and runs across multiple hosting platforms.
Brandy said the system scrapes listings from about 40 major platforms and aggregates data into a front‑end dashboard for county users. "We have mapped out the jurisdiction boundaries for unincorporated Weber County, and our software goes out and scrapes up listings for short term rentals. Anything less than 30 days in your area on all the major platforms, there's like 40 top platforms that we scrape," she said.
She also noted account access for county users: "IRIS and Bill already have theirs, but other people, can have logins to the system as needed, within your jurisdiction, within the county offices, or however you would like that to look," Brandy said.
The presentation focused on the tool’s data‑collection and user‑access features; no formal action, vote, or implementation timetable was recorded in the transcript. The transcript did not specify which county office would manage access, what data fields are stored, or how the county would use the data for enforcement or permitting.
County staff or officials seeking more details on deployment, costs, or legal constraints were not recorded as asking questions in the provided transcript excerpt. The vendor’s demonstration establishes the availability of a county‑specific dashboard and user login options but leaves implementation steps, responsibilities, and any required approvals unspecified.
