Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Courts And Legal topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council gives first reading to update municipal court code; sets maximum fine and adds automatic expungement process
Summary
City Attorney Brad Timish presented Ordinance 22-93 to bring Chapter 9 (courts, fines and imprisonment) into alignment with current court procedures and state statutes; council approved the ordinance’s first reading.
City Attorney Brad Timish presented Ordinance 22-93 on May 19, a proposed update to City Code Chapter 9 (municipal court, fines and imprisonment). Council approved the ordinance on first reading, sending it forward through the required ordinance process.
Why this matters: the ordinance modernizes language that in many places dated to 1937, aligns municipal code with Wyoming state statutes and clarifies penalties, probation and bond procedures for municipal-court matters.
Notable changes described by staff: - Penalties: the code explicitly sets the maximum fine for nonjailable municipal offenses at $750 and restates municipal court fee authority (a $10 court fee as referenced). - Automatic expungement: the draft adds an automatic expungement process consistent with state statute—expungement will occur after six months with no intervening conviction, removing the prior step that required a defendant to petition the court. - Juvenile provisions and jailable offenses: the draft removes obsolete sections tied to a city jail (the city no longer operates a municipal jail) and clarifies that municipal court will not impose jail for status offenses consistent with state law; certain matters that now proceed to circuit court were removed from municipal code. - Procedure clarifications: updates reference the Wyoming Rules of Criminal Procedure (Rule 3.1 was cited for bond forfeiture) and reflect current county/city practices for confinement, bond collection and probation conditions.
Council discussion and vote: Timish summarized revisions and responded to council and public clarification questions about juvenile adjudications and use of the county jail for confinement. Following a motion and second, council members voted aye on the ordinance’s first reading.
Next steps: the ordinance passed its first reading and will proceed through subsequent readings and publication requirements before final adoption. Staff noted that municipal judges and the police department participated in drafting the changes.
