Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Calworks Streamlining topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
CDSS seeks CalWORKs streamlining in May revision; LAO, counties seek details on savings and implementation
Summary
CDSS presented CalWORKs trailer‑bill proposals that would expand allowable welfare‑to‑work activities, make job club optional, simplify sanction curing, and eliminate two WPR reporting systems (RadUp, E2 Lite) to reduce workload and generate savings.
The Senate subcommittee reviewed the Department of Social Services' CalWORKs trailer‑bill package in the May revision, which proposes streamlined program rules and a set of automation changes intended to reduce administrative workload and generate ongoing savings.
Key proposals presented
- Broaden the list of allowable welfare‑to‑work activities to include "meaningful and goal oriented activities" such as case plan development, welfare‑to‑work plan revisions, or coaching with a case manager.
- Make job club an optional activity rather than required.
- Simplify the process for curing sanctions by eliminating a required signature and relying on documented conversations between caseworkers and clients as evidence of cure intent.
- Eliminate the RadUp and E2 Lite reporting systems and administratively extract welfare‑to‑work reporting data from CalSAWS to reduce county social‑worker data entry and recognize workload relief in the single allocation. CDSS estimated one‑time automation costs of $1.5 million and ongoing savings of approximately $18.2 million (total funds) associated with system eliminations.
What LAO and counties said
- The LAO said the streamlining proposals grew from earlier pilot discussions and that costs for the automation work are modest; however, the LAO emphasized it needs to review trailer‑bill text to assess mechanics and verify the administration's savings assumptions.
- The County Welfare Directors Association asked the committee to preserve single‑allocation funding and not redirect automation savings away from county operations; CWDA argued the single allocation remains chronically underfunded.
Implementation timing and scoring
CDSS said some streamlining changes would take effect in the budget year (July 1) if enacted, while automation changes require technical updates. LAO and legislators asked for clear scoring of where savings accrue (county vs. state) and whether county workload relief anticipated by eliminating data entry systems will materialize.
Discussion vs. decisions
The proposals were described as part of the May revision; LAO requested access to trailer bill text to complete its review. No formal committee action or vote was reported in the transcript.
Ending note
Committee members and stakeholders asked CDSS and DOF to preserve single‑allocation funding for county services, to provide clearer breakdowns of automation costs and savings, and to share trailer bill language for legislative review.
