Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Contracts topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

EDC reviews three options for Fulshear Fast Track contract addendum; no final decision

3395518 · May 19, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Board members discussed three options for a third-year addendum to the Fulshear Fast Track arrangement: a full-time managing director through The Cannon, an in-house employee plus a smaller contract with The Cannon, or a transitional option keeping the status quo. Staff will return with detailed cost comparisons.

The Fulshear Development Corporation discussed a proposed three-year addendum to its Fulshear Fast Track arrangement and asked staff to return with more detailed cost and staffing information before making a final choice.

Staff presented two primary contract options included in the board packet and described a third option the advisory board had requested. Option one would continue The Cannon’s role but convert the managing-director position to a full-time contract role; the packet lists a budgeted amount of $216,850 for that option. Option two would shift the managing-director role to an in-house city employee while keeping a reduced contract with The Cannon for programming and services; the packet lists a contract amount of $71,500 for that option, while staff noted the city would incur additional personnel costs for a new employee.

The advisory board’s third option, proposed during prior discussions, would maintain the current part-time managing-director arrangement with Matt (The Cannon) and add a part-time city staff member to support a more gradual transition. Board members emphasized the value of continuity and the local connections that have been built under the current arrangement and said recruitment of a comparable experienced candidate would be difficult and could be costly.

Board members asked staff to prepare more definite numbers on full-time and part-time personnel costs, the expected ongoing contract costs with The Cannon, and a clearer transition timeline. Staff said the current Cannon contract runs through December and that the sooner the board articulates preferred options the better; staff also noted city council will review any resulting budget requests as part of the FY26 process.

No vote was taken; the board requested a follow-up report with detailed cost comparisons and a proposed implementation schedule.