Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Animal Services Cremator topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council weighs options after animal-clinic cremator shows heavy wear; no decision made
Summary
Councilors heard that the city-owned cremator at a local clinic is wearing through and faces an estimated $4,000'$5,000 repair; council directed staff to research alternatives and invite clinic representatives for a follow-up meeting.
Get email alerts on the Animal Services Cremator topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council members on May 19 discussed repair and long-term options for a city-owned cremator unit that the Augusta Animal Clinic uses under an informal, long-standing arrangement.
City Manager Josh Shaw told the council the cremator is showing significant wear in the burn chamber and the clinic provided a repair quote in the $4,000 to $5,000 range. Shaw said the original agreement that governed the clinic's use of the city-owned unit expired many years ago and the city has continued honoring the arrangement without a current contract.
"My guess is by the time we actually get it done maybe in the 4,000 to 5,000 range," Shaw said when outlining the repair estimate. He also said the city pays the gas bill for the unit, about $200 a month, and that current finances make the arrangement questionable.
Council members and staff discussed alternatives including burying carcasses (which raises land-use and zoning questions), moving to a new city-owned facility, or asking the clinic to sign a formal agreement before the city pays for repairs. One council member said the city has explored building its own facility, but staff estimated that would likely cost in the $50,000 to $60,000 range and would require appropriate zoning and certification.
Augusta law enforcement officials described the current process: the city provides a freezer for carcasses, the clinic incorporates the city's animals into routine cremations, and the city currently pays the fuel bill. The police chief said he would like more time to find alternatives and did not support immediate approval of repairs without additional negotiation.
The council directed staff to continue researching options, to invite the clinic to a future meeting to discuss terms, and to provide cost estimates for replacement, repair life cycle and potential alternatives (including whether burial is legally permissible and what zoning would be required). No formal vote to repair or replace the unit was taken at the May 19 meeting.

