Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Civil Rights topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Civil Rights Department seeks contract-exemption language to continue California '0 vs Hate hotline

3390712 · May 19, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Civil Rights Department requested a technical correction to restore previously approved permanent positions and asked the subcommittee to extend contract-exemption language so the California vs Hate 2-1-1 hotline can continue without a new competitive procurement in next fiscal year.

Mary Weed, chief deputy director of the Civil Rights Department (CRD), told the subcommittee the department seeks two May revision fixes: a technical correction to restore $1.7 million and eight positions that were coded as limited term in a prior budget action, and renewal of contract-exemption language for the California versus Hate initiative's 2-1-1 hotline.

CRD's request and rationale - Technical correction: CRD asked for a coding correction to make eight positions and $1.7 million ongoing, restoring previously approved funding that had been mis-coded as limited-term. - Contract-exemption language: CRD asked that the budget include language exempting a short-term contract for the California versus Hate hotline from normal competitive bidding and DGS approval for the 1-year period needed to continue operations. CRD officials said 2-1-1 LA is the only vendor with the portal, staffing and culturally competent bilingual capacity built to meet the program's needs on short notice and that an exemption is necessary to avoid a service interruption.

Analyst views and committee discussion - LAO recommended careful use of contract exemptions and said CRD should begin scoping a competitive procurement if the Legislature were to continue funding the hotline beyond a one-year extension. The LAO noted that funding the hotline for a year and using an exemption is reasonable if the Legislature intends a short extension; the LAO recommended removing a full-year staff appropriation if the program were being eliminated. - Senators pressed CRD on timing and whether the exemption could have been requested earlier; CRD said the department delayed a procurement while awaiting budget action and needs the exemption to avoid service interruption.

Committee outcome: Committee members expressed support for continuing the hotline in the near term, flagged the broader procurement and competition issue for follow-up, and left the item open.

Why it matters: Lawmakers described recent spikes in hate incidents and said maintaining an accessible hotline and culturally competent care coordination is an immediate public-safety and civil-rights service.