Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Naming Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Coppell council asks staff to draft criteria for naming non‑park city facilities and to consider sponsorship policy
Summary
Mayor Pro Tem Carol asked staff to prepare a naming policy for municipal facilities that aren’t park properties and to assess how sponsorship or naming rights should be handled; council asked staff to review existing Section 9 park naming rules—some of which require honorees to be deceased—and return with recommendations.
Mayor Pro Tem Carol asked staff to develop a clear process and criteria for naming city‑owned facilities that are not part of the park system at the Oct. 14 Coppell City Council meeting.
Council members said existing rules in the municipal code explicitly address park naming and include a requirement that honorees be deceased; Carol and others asked staff to draft a parallel set of guidelines for non‑park facilities (for example, civic facilities, community experience venues or buildings). "So that's what I would like to ask is if we if I could ask staff to go back and figure out what could be a process or criteria for naming non‑park facilities," Mayor Pro Tem Carol said.
Discussion covered whether the city should permit commercial sponsorship and naming rights, how exceptions to a deceased‑honoree rule should be handled and whether the existing park naming criteria should be revised to match any new citywide policy. Council members cited prior local namings (for example the Amphitheater performance pavilion) and asked staff to bring a consolidated policy proposal back to the council for consideration.
Council asked staff to return with draft criteria and to include a review of sponsorship possibilities and the park section (Section 9) that currently governs park naming. No formal council action was taken; the item was a direction to staff to prepare a policy for future council consideration.
