Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners approve groundwater availability for Homeland Estates subdivision in Precinct 3
Summary
The court accepted evidence of groundwater availability for Homeland Estates (Precinct 3) — relying on a nearby city well report — and approved a motion that waives a separate groundwater availability study for the developer.
Erath County Commissioners Court voted on May 27 to accept submitted evidence of groundwater availability for the proposed Homeland Estates subdivision in Precinct 3 and to approve the developer’s request that a formal groundwater availability study not be required.
Why it matters: Local subdivision regulations require a groundwater availability study for subdivisions of 11 lots or more unless credible evidence of groundwater availability in the vicinity is provided. County staff brought a 454‑page report showing nearby city water wells and test results to support the developer’s request.
Mr. Gardner, the county’s director of land development, told the court that Texas Local Government Code 232 requires a groundwater availability study when a subdivision is 11 lots or more but that the code permits the county to accept credible evidence instead. Gardner presented a NICS report documenting city water wells located roughly 600 feet from the property line and said the documentation shows groundwater is available in the area.
Commissioner Stevens moved to approve the groundwater availability for Homeland Estates subdivision in Precinct 3; Commissioner Edwards seconded the motion. The court voted in favor by voice vote and the motion carried (no roll‑call tallies were recorded in the transcript).
Gardner acknowledged the county cannot guarantee long‑term water availability, saying the evidence reflects present conditions and that the city’s well field nearby supports the conclusion that water exists in the vicinity.
Ending: The court’s approval relieves the developer from commissioning a separate groundwater availability study for this application per the county’s interpretation of the Local Government Code and the evidence provided at the meeting.
