MSAD 51 presents administrative guidelines for generative AI; committee recommends staff and student boundaries, pilot platforms and professional development
Summary
The MSAD 51 board heard administrative guidelines for generative artificial intelligence that set staff and student boundaries, call for tailored professional development and propose piloting two school-focused AI platforms; students and staff raised concerns about unreliable AI-detection tools and student anxiety.
MSAD 51 board members heard a presentation May 22 on draft administrative procedures for generative artificial intelligence and the district's plan to roll out training, classroom guidance and pilot platforms.
The procedures, developed this year using a draft from the legal firm Drummond & Woodson as a starting point, are administrative guidelines rather than formal board policy, Mari told the board. They outline expectations for staff and student use: AI should enhance, not replace, lesson planning or learning; users must respect copyright and data-privacy agreements; staff must protect confidential information and model ethical use; students must obtain teacher permission for generative AI on assignments, cite AI sources and be taught to critically evaluate AI outputs.
Why it matters: The district said it wants flexible rules that can change quickly as tools evolve while creating consistent classroom practices. Board members and students urged caution about punitive uses of AI-detection software and asked for clear, school-by-school professional development so teachers and students know how to use — and when not to use — generative…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Full Access to all Government Meetings, including transcripts, videos, etc.
- Full Search and Browse across all local, state, and federal meetings
- Breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions & budgets
- Instant alerts
- Usage of our AI for Government Meetings
