Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Municipal Legislation And Projects topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council approves habitat-conservation and legal-fees ordinances; authorizes museum and band shell change order
Summary
The council approved Ordinance 659 (habitat conservation) and Ordinance 661 (legal fees) on final readings and approved change order No. 2 on the museum and band shell project, extending completion and making construction and lighting changes.
Get email alerts on the Municipal Legislation And Projects topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The City Council approved two ordinances and a construction change order during the meeting. Ordinance 659, concerning habitat conservation, and Ordinance 661, concerning legal fees, were each read previously and carried on final vote. The council also approved Change Order No. 2 for the museum and band shell project, which alters hardware and lighting and extends the project completion date.
Council members said Ordinance 659 had been read at the May 27 meeting and that no changes had been made since. A motion to approve the ordinance carried on a voice vote. Ordinance 661 likewise was described as having been read at the prior meeting with no subsequent changes; a motion to approve it carried on a voice vote.
On the museum and band shell project, staff described multiple construction changes: replacing an undersized door with a full-size metal door, replacing the band shell lighting with LED fixtures better suited to the facility’s uses, and extending the contract completion date from June 3 to June 20. Staff said the contractor expects to meet the extended date. Council members raised practical access concerns for the stage area, noting equipment is heavy and that a landing or ramp would ease loading, but they did not reach a new directive on that issue during the meeting.
Staff stated a total cost for the changes; the transcript included two figures that were not clarified during the discussion. The record refers to "$73,769.10" and also to "$6,700" in a single contiguous statement; staff did not clarify the relationship between those two figures on the record. The change order motion carried.

