Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Legislative Process topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Governance committee refines public map of how ideas become city measures
Summary
Portland's governance committee reviewed a staff-drafted flowchart showing how an idea becomes an ordinance or resolution, debated how to present emergency or bypass routes, and agreed to produce a simple public-facing graphic with a more detailed checklist for council offices.
Get email alerts on the Legislative Process topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Portland City Council’s Governance Committee on June 9 examined a staff-drafted visual map showing how proposals move from sponsors to committee or full council, with committee members pressing for clearer arrows and language to match city code.
The chart, prepared by Jennifer Park of council policy staff, is “trying to make a visualization of what the chapter, code chapter 3.02 specifically, so it's really a direct visual interpretation of code,” Park told the committee. Committee members said the draft helped but left ambiguous whether certain items — notably emergency ordinances, ordinances that amend city code, or other agenda items — must or may bypass committees and go straight to full council.
Committee members said the document should have two versions: a simplified, highly visual guide for the public and a more detailed checklist for council offices and staff. “For the public…something like this would be really helpful. Yes. Just super simple,” one councilor said while urging fewer caveats on the public-facing piece and a fuller checklist for staff use.
Members discussed where to show exceptions on the chart. Jennifer Park said the graphic was “a direct visual interpretation of code” and identified the specific code language that informed the draft. Committee members asked that the flowchart make clear that, in practice, even items that bypass committee frequently have some prior briefing or work session, and that the chart should say that items “typically” receive technical briefings before going to full council.
The committee also debated whether to explicitly call out which types of items may bypass committee. One councilor noted that emergency ordinances sometimes do go to committee and asked the final public graphic not to imply emergency ordinances never go to committee. Members suggested placing a short explanatory line or an overlay noting that agenda items may bypass committee and that briefings or work sessions frequently occur beforehand.
The committee agreed on next steps: produce a concise, public-facing flowchart and a second, more detailed checklist for council offices that lists the drafting, review and filing steps. Council staff and the council president’s office will revise the graphic and return with an updated version at a future governance meeting.

