Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Elections And Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Brentwood commission opts for appointment process, sets application timeline for vacant seat
Summary
Commissioners signaled consensus to fill a recent vacancy by appointment rather than by special election, directing staff to publish an application, accept submissions and place an appointment on a July meeting agenda; commissioners noted an August statutory deadline that would trigger a special election if left unmet.
Brentwood City Commissioners signaled consensus to fill a current commission vacancy by appointment rather than calling a special election and directed staff to publish an application and timeline for submissions.
The commission agreed that staff should release the application after the June 9 meeting, set a submission deadline on Friday, June 27, and place an appointment on the July 14 commission meeting agenda. Commissioners noted that state law requires an appointment by Aug. 11 or the vacancy must be filled by special election.
Commissioners and staff discussed changes to the standard board application to make it more appropriate for a commission appointment. Proposed additions include: a question asking why the applicant wishes to serve as a Brentwood City Commissioner; a description of relevant qualifications; confirmation the applicant is familiar with the city’s form of government and meeting schedule; and a clear statement of time commitments and expectations. The application will include an optional references field rather than a required letter of recommendation.
Staff said the city’s current board-management software can be used to post the revised application quickly once the commission finalizes wording. Commissioners agreed staff should circulate a draft application for individual review before it is posted.
Commissioners discussed whether to hold interviews and how to handle candidate contact consistent with open-meetings rules. They noted that two or more commissioners cannot meet privately with a candidate without creating a public meeting under Tennessee open-meetings law; commissioners may individually contact applicants, or the commission may hold a publicly noticed interview session. Commissioners also reviewed an earlier (2008) ballot/validation procedure used to pare candidate lists in rounds if needed; they did not adopt a single fixed procedure and left final validation rules to be discussed at an upcoming briefing.
On the mechanics of selecting an appointee, staff confirmed the ballots used at the appointment meeting are public under open-meetings requirements; the city’s prior procedure permitted successive rounds with candidates who received zero votes falling off the list until a candidate garnered a majority.
Staff said the intent is to balance speed with public transparency. Commissioners asked staff to return the final application text and a short timeline and validation procedure in time for the July appointment agenda if the commission follows the proposed schedule.
