Citizen Portal
Sign In

Lifetime Citizen Portal Access — AI Briefings, Alerts & Unlimited Follows

Washoe County planning panel initiates 2025 Tahoe Area Plan update to adopt TRPA housing incentives and code fixes

3645206 · June 4, 2025

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Washoe County Planning Commission voted unanimously June 3 to initiate a package of updates to the Tahoe Area Plan and related development code that adopts Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA) Phase 2 housing incentives, clarifies accessory dwelling unit rules, and removes a mapping anomaly for Tyrolean Village.

The Washoe County Planning Commission on June 3 voted unanimously to initiate and recommend approval of a package of Development Code and Master Plan amendments collectively called the 2025 Tahoe Area Plan Update.

The package would amend Washoe County Code chapter 110 (Tahoe Area Plan and Tahoe Area design standards), adopt code changes required to conform with the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(TRPA) Phase 2 housing amendments, and delete the Tyrolean Village special area from the Tahoe Area regulatory zone map. "This is a development code amendment, a master plan amendment, and a regulatory zone amendment that is called the 2025 Tahoe Area Plan Update," Senior Planner Kat Oakley told the commission.

Why it matters: TRPA adopted Phase 2 housing amendments in 2023 that create incentives for deed-restricted housing (affordable, moderate and "achievable" housing for local employees). Washoe County must update its local regulations to conform with TRPA or risk inconsistent rules in the Tahoe Basin. The commission's initiation is the first formal step toward sending the county's proposed ordinance to the Board of County Commissioners and to TRPA for final action.

Key changes proposed - Adopt TRPA Phase 2 incentives for 100% deed-restricted residential developments and qualifying mixed-use projects: reduced parking requirements (town centers: no fixed minimum with an approved parking analysis; outside town centers: as low as 0.75 spaces per unit), expanded allowable lot coverage (town centers: existing 70% maximum would not apply; outside town centers coverage could increase from 30% to 70% where area-wide stormwater treatment exists), additional height allowances (an extra 9 feet in town centers), and removal of maximum residential density limits for deed-restricted projects. Oakley noted that regardless of density, developments still require TRPA residential allocations or bonus units to build new units. - Expand accessory dwelling unit (ADU) allowances in the Tahoe Basin: remove the 1-acre minimum lot requirement for ADUs, allow ADUs up to 1,200 square feet on lots under 1 acre, permit detached ADUs under 500 square feet and under 12 feet tall to sit 5 feet from side and rear property lines, and restate that ADUs cannot be used as short-term rentals. - Administrative and cleanup edits: remove a special-use permit requirement for single-family homes in several regulatory zones (Crystal Bay, Incline Village 5, East Shore) and replace it with a mandatory hold-harmless agreement where hazards exist; add Tahoe Transportation District participation in parking management planning; and correct organizational references, use-table clarifications and other typographical fixes. - Mapping change: delete the Tyrolean Village special area (approximately 2.24 acres, APN 126-420-02) to remove two tourist-accommodation use types that were approved by TRPA but never realized on the ground or approved locally.

Public outreach and concerns Staff reported two rounds of outreach since December, including public workshops, pop-up events, surveys and a webinar. Oakley said the county received substantial comment about the TRPA Phase 2 incentives. "We heard concern about community character, infrastructure, and evacuation, and also about parking and enforcement of deed restrictions," she said. Oakley said staff explored a local alternative with TRPA that would have limited some incentives but that TRPA did not support that alternative; the county proposal therefore opts in to TRPA's amendments while adding local standards, particularly for parking analyses, to limit unintended spillover impacts.

Implementation and next steps The planning commission's recommendation is subject to final approval by the Washoe County Board of County Commissioners and also requires a finding of conformance with the TRPA Regional Plan by the Regional Planning Authority. The motion authorized the commission chair to sign resolutions and directed staff to send the commission's recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners within 60 days.

Commission action and vote Commissioner Dan Lazarevski moved to initiate the amendments and recommend approval; Commissioner Linda Kennedy seconded. The motion passed unanimously.

Background and constraints Oakley reminded the commission that TRPA's growth-management system limits available residential allocations in the basin: staff reported roughly 235 residential allocations remain and 16 bonus units are available that must be used for deed-restricted housing. Oakley also noted that certain incentives (for example expanded coverage up to 70% outside town centers) require area-wide stormwater treatment systems, of which none currently exist in Washoe County, limiting immediate use of some incentives.

Funding, enforcement and outstanding questions The proposed package does not itself appropriate funding. Oakley said some changes (for example, expanded allowances and administrative review processes) are intended to reduce barriers to workforce housing but that enforcement of deed restrictions and long-term monitoring remain a source of public concern. The planning commission did not receive public comment at the hearing on June 3.