Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Elections topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public commenters oppose ranked‑choice voting; council declines participation in 2025 pilot
Summary
Two members of the public spoke against adopting ranked‑choice voting; council members weighed cost, clarity and local uptake and voted not to participate in the 2025 ranked‑choice pilot program.
During public forum two residents spoke against the town adopting ranked‑choice voting. Renee Gein said she had experience as an election judge and found ranked‑choice voting confusing and chaotic; she described seeing a candidate initially reported in third place at 100% precincts reported who later became first as counting progressed. Another resident, Corinne, criticized ranked‑choice voting on procedural and accountability grounds and asked council to review printed material she provided.
Council discussion referenced voter clarity, administrative cost and the small number of Utah municipalities participating in the program. Several council members and members of the public expressed concern that ranked‑choice voting could erode direct accountability and confuse voters. After discussion the council moved not to adopt the town’s participation in the ranked‑choice voting pilot for 2025; the motion to not approve the resolution was carried.
Why it matters: The decision affects how Genola voters will cast ballots in 2025 and whether the town will trial an alternative ballot format. Councilors cited cost, local understanding and the limited number of peer municipalities in Utah using ranked‑choice voting as reasons for declining the pilot.
Next step: The town will proceed with its regular election process with Utah County administering the election under the interlocal agreement approved earlier in the meeting.
