Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Student Technology Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Wyndham Raymond board advances plan for bell-to-bell cellphone restrictions; first reading scheduled

5436990 · June 4, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The RSU 14 policy committee presented a draft to restrict student cellphone use during the school day and the board agreed to place the proposal on the agenda for first reading at the next meeting, setting up a possible change before the new school year.

The Wyndham Raymond School District’s (RSU 14) policy committee brought the district’s review of cellular-device rules to the full school board on June 4, outlining a proposal that would largely ban student cellphone use during the defined school day and designate elementary bus runs and most field trips as no-device zones.

The committee described an extended review process that began Feb. 24 and included administrator and staff surveys, consultations with the Maine School Management Association (MSMA), the Maine Principals Association and other subject-matter resources, and a review of literature on student wellbeing and device use. The draft presented to the board would limit device use to before students enter school and after dismissal, allow medical and other narrowly defined exemptions, and remove a regulation that currently prescribes disciplinary steps.

Policy committee members said the change aims to reduce in-school distractions and the “compulsive checking” effect of social media during instructional time. Board members and administrators acknowledged enforcement challenges in high-traffic areas such as passing time and the cafeteria and heard that current practice already varies by classroom; the committee said the draft seeks to create a consistent expectation across teachers and buildings.

Discussion at the June 4 meeting covered enforcement logistics, differences in device use between middle- and high-school students, and potential carve-outs for wearable devices used for medical or athletic monitoring. Several board members expressed support for a bell-to-bell approach on student well-being grounds but asked staff to consider a narrowly tailored exception for medical devices and athletic trackers that do not broadcast social media notifications.

Board members also noted timing constraints: changing a district-wide policy outside of the standard policy-adoption calendar will require coordination with student/parent handbooks and communications to families. The board agreed to place the draft policy on the agenda for a first reading at the next board meeting so staff can prepare implementation materials and final language for a possible second reading later this month. No formal policy vote was taken on June 4.

If the board proceeds, administrators said they will prepare outreach and implementation guidance for staff, families and students, and outline enforcement expectations for the start of next school year.