Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Planning And Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission approves multiple site plans; UDOT access rules create unexpected costs for new homeowners
Summary
The Genola planning commission approved several site plans and home sites and discussed a recently enforced UDOT rule requiring 200 feet between access points that created an exception and added costs for a completed home driveway.
The Genola Planning Commission reported a busy month, approving multiple home site and accessory‑building permits and flagging items that require follow‑up by the council and building inspector.
Commission remarks listed approvals for parcels including 625 North 800 East (park residents), 324 North Main Street (Mitchells), 529 North 470 East (Weavers accessory building), 248 South State (Jacqueline’s site plan), 1677 North Main Street (Pardue) and 384 South Main Street (Bowers Family Trust). Commissioners asked the council to consider incorporating soil reports and rescheck (residential energy compliance) requirements into the building‑permit process and discussed whether subdivision rules should explicitly require UDOT access approvals.
A separate discussion focused on a UDOT access rule that the commission said requires about 200 feet between any two access points along a given side of a state route. In one recent case the town learned only after a house was built that a driveway placement did not meet UDOT’s spacing. UDOT granted an exception for the existing driveway but required the homeowner or builder to pave a 20‑foot‑wide section and meet compaction/thickness requirements near the state right‑of‑way. Commissioners and staff said the town will add UDOT clearance checks to subdivision and site‑plan review to avoid leaving future homeowners with retrofit costs.
Why it matters: approvals permit new construction and affect homeowners who may face thousands of dollars in retrofits if state access rules are not checked before building permits are issued. The commission emphasized updating permit submittal requirements and coordination with UDOT to prevent similar problems.
What the commission will do next: staff will consider adding written UDOT verification requirements to subdivision and site‑plan submittal lists, and the building inspector and planning staff will return proposed ordinance language to council for consideration.
