Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Utilities topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Charlottesville proposes utility rate increases; gas volatility cited as largest driver
Summary
City utilities staff presented proposed water, sewer, stormwater and gas rate changes for July 1; staff said Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority costs and higher natural-gas purchase prices were the primary drivers. Council opened a public hearing; no vote was taken (first of two readings for the ordinance).
Get email alerts on the Utilities topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Charlottesville utilities staff presented an annual rate report proposing changes to water, wastewater and natural gas rates beginning July 1, citing rising costs at Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority (RWSA) and increased natural-gas purchase prices.
Lauren Hildebrand, director of utilities, and Chris Cullinan, director of finance, described the system and customer base — roughly 14,800 water customers and 21,600 gas customers — and said the most significant cost drivers are external: RWSA’s operations and recent debt service and commodity natural-gas price increases.
City staff said the total monthly bill for an average residential customer across all four utilities is expected to rise about $12.84 per month under the proposed rates. Cullinan explained the difference between the headline percentage in the legal ad and the practical monthly impact: natural-gas prices are adjusted monthly through a purchase-gas adjustment; although the ad compared July-to-July rates and showed a larger year-over-year percentage, the month-to-July comparison yields a smaller point change. "We are asking folks to pay more for their utility service," Cullinan said, but added that customers still retain control over most of their bill through usage.
Speakers at the public hearing urged clearer communication on multi-year rate trajectories and questioned the distributional impact of the rates on renters and low-income households. Several citizens noted the city’s $6–8 million annual “payment in lieu of taxes” from utilities to the general fund and asked whether the structure of that transfer reduces incentives to decarbonize the utility or pursue electrification.
Council opened the required public hearing; the ordinance is scheduled for a second reading on June 16. No rate ordinance vote occurred at this meeting.

