Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Annexation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Orangeville members reopen discussion on McCoy/Alread annexation; scheduling vote for next meeting
Summary
Members agreed to revisit an annexation proposal tied to property associated with McCoy/Alread, instructed additional study of roads, sewer and health department requirements, and voted to place formal consideration on next month’s agenda.
Members at a local Orangeville meeting agreed to reopen discussion of an annexation proposal related to a McCoy/Alread property and scheduled formal consideration for the next meeting.
Board discussion centered on infrastructure and legal boundaries: members asked whether the county road separating the parcel counts against the city boundary, who would pay for future road overlays and whether sewer service reaches the parcel. One member read a passage from the city’s annexation policy noting that the council may approve septic systems in place of city sewer if health-department guidelines and ground testing are satisfied.
Speakers repeatedly raised that the county maintains the existing road and that title deeds for the parcel exclude the road from the property; several members said that under the annexation policy roads need not be treated as barriers. A member also said Todd Thorne, a county planning official who previously briefed the board, had cautioned against creating an “island” annexation and had described problems other cities encountered.
Members discussed practicalities: whether the annexation would create a municipal responsibility for road overlays currently paid for by the county, whether any developer grant would obligate the city to contribute funds, and whether property owners would be required to prove septic suitability through soil testing.
After discussion, a board member moved “to revisit the McCoy/Alread annexation plan” and a second supported the motion. The motion passed by voice vote with no recorded opposition. Members instructed staff and board members to gather additional detail — including a follow-up call to Todd Thorne and clarifications on sewer boundaries — and to place the annexation for a formal vote on next month’s agenda so the city council can be informed.
The transcript shows the board did not vote to approve annexation at this meeting; rather, the meeting produced direction to research infrastructure, legal boundaries and health-department requirements before the next formal vote.
Because state review may be required to complete an annexation, members noted any local decision would be subject to state-level review and approval.
