Custer County commissioners remove planning and zoning director after debate over firearms policy

Custer County commissioners voted Wednesday to remove Dorothy Carlson as director of the county planning and zoning office, effective at 5 p.m. June 11.

Commissioner Paul Vogelsohn introduced the motion, citing county policy requiring that firearms carried by employees on county property, including in county vehicles, be concealed unless the employee is classified as law enforcement. Vogelsohn moved “to remove Dorothy Carlson as director of planning and zoning and terminate her employment with Custer County effective at the close of business today, the June, 05:00 20 25,” and the board voted in favor.

The action followed public discussion in an open meeting after the board declined to hold the item in executive session. County Attorney Dan Slater advised the board that by choosing an open meeting the commissioners were effectively waiving confidentiality for the personnel matter and discussing it publicly under Colorado meeting law.

Carlson spoke briefly during the public discussion; she said she would answer questions truthfully but added, “at this point, I care for my life and the safety of my family, and that's all I'm gonna say.” Her husband, Roger Carlson, addressed the board and said that on the occasion cited he had been present and that his wife was not carrying a firearm in the vehicle that day.

Commissioners who voted aye were Paul Vogelsohn, Commissioner Lucas and Commissioner Kanda. The motion record did not specify a recorded second on the motion. The board did not provide additional written findings in the public record beyond the statements made at the meeting.

Background and process notes: county counsel told the commissioners that the county employee handbook requires concealment of firearms on county property for non-law-enforcement employees. Vogelsohn stated he had received additional information from an elected official and other sources alleging instances of open carry by a county employee on county business; he said he did not have names, dates or times to present publicly. The board proceeded with the removal vote after a period of public comment and brief discussion.

The board recorded the action during its regular meeting; no settlement terms, separation agreement or other employment‑related financial details were announced on the record. The county attorney noted the usual confidentiality of personnel matters and reiterated that commissioners had chosen an open session for this item.

The board adjourned following the item. The record shows no further immediate personnel actions announced at the meeting.