Commission discusses storage containers, accessory buildings and ramping up code enforcement

Commissioners examined how storage containers, accessory structures and unpermitted dwelling conversions are addressed in the municipal code, and reviewed the city’s code‑enforcement approach.

Staff noted the code contains a substantial storage‑container section that treats containers primarily as non‑residential storage and caps maximum listed height at 8 feet in some places. Commissioners asked whether storage containers converted into residences (shipping‑container homes) should be treated differently and whether the code should limit containers in residential backyards. Delaney Garlic and staff said building permits and the California Building Code determine whether an altered container can be used as a dwelling; the commission recommended creating clearer zoning standards if the city wants to restrict or allow container dwellings in particular zones.

On enforcement, staff described a complaint‑driven process and a new code‑enforcement workflow being implemented through the city’s Tyler finance/permits module. Staff said residents can file anonymous complaints now by form or phone; the new portal will let the public submit and track code complaints online. The code enforcement officer — now staffed and noted as working on outreach — seeks voluntary compliance first; if necessary the city may issue fines, abate nuisances and place liens on property tax rolls. Staff described a recent example where abatement costs exceeded $70,000 on a derelict property.

Commissioners asked how conditional use permits and prior entitlements are tracked when properties change hands. Staff said entitlements commonly “run with the land” and that a change of ownership alone does not usually trigger a re‑permit; staff suggested business license address changes often trigger planning staff review when a new business opens at an existing address. The commission asked staff to check legal procedures for recording conditions of approval against the county recorder and to consult the city attorney about consequences of recording restrictive conditions to title.

The commission asked staff to consider whether the code should limit the number, size or location of storage containers on residential lots and to return with specific drafting options.