Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Voting Conflict Resignation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission reviews abstention rule, conflicts of interest and automatic resignation policy
Summary
Members discussed whether abstentions should count as negative votes, conflict-of-interest definitions, and the charter rule that a council member automatically vacates a seat if they announce candidacy for certain other offices.
The review commission examined how abstentions and conflicts of interest are treated under the charter and related city rules on May 21.
Staff explained that the current charter treats an abstention as a negative vote unless the abstention is due to a conflict of interest. "An abstention to vote is a negative vote unless the reason for the abstention is a conflict of interest," a city staff member said, adding the policy aims to discourage routine abstentions on nonconflict grounds. Commissioners split on the change: one commissioner said counting abstentions as negative votes discourages tactical abstentions that could otherwise lower a majority threshold, while another warned it could "muddy the waters" and lead to political abstentions.
Members asked for clearer definitions of conflicts of interest. Staff said the charter references conflict-of-interest definitions under state law and the city's ethics code, and noted that campaign contributions generally do not create legal conflicts: "Usually that's having some type of percentage ownership in a business entity that has business before the council or, ownership of real estate. Generally speaking, though, campaign contributions do not create a conflict."
Commissioners also discussed the charter rule that a council member who announces candidacy for another office effectively vacates their seat if more than one year remains on the term. A staff member explained: "If a council member announces candidacy for a different office... their seat... becomes vacant, if they have more than 1 year left on their term." Commissioners noted that is currently a state-law practice or established rule and said members should be strategic about timing if they intend to run for other offices.
Ending: Staff indicated they will retain references to state-law conflict definitions and note the abstention rule in the proposed redline; commissioners asked for clearer language and cross-reference to the city's ethics code.
