Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Mosquito Abatement Procurement topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ada County awards mosquito-abatement chemical contracts after procurement review

3408661 · May 20, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Ada County commissioners approved award letters for bid 25056, authorizing multiple vendors to supply insecticide products for mosquito abatement for FY25 as recommended by procurement and the evaluation team.

Ada County commissioners voted Wednesday to award bid 25056, a countywide purchase of mosquito-abatement insecticide products for fiscal year 2025, adopting the evaluation team's recommendation and a procurement award letter.

Procurement staff told the board the evaluation team reviewed three formal bids and recommended awards to multiple vendors for specific products and quantities. Procurement summarized the recommendation in a letter dated May 20, 2025 and read the list into the record. The item passed on a voice vote: “All in favor say aye,” the chair said; the motion carried.

Why it matters: the purchases supply products used by the county mosquito-abatement program. Procurement and the Weed and Mosquito Abatement director recommended splitting awards among vendors to distribute business locally and ensure access to required products.

Details: Ada County Procurement recommended awards that name specific products and the corresponding vendor and price. Procurement said some awards were recommended to a local vendor “for equal distribution of business and that [the vendor] is a local company.” The written recommendation lists product-by-product awards and prices; the board approved that list as read into the record.

Board action and process: Commissioner motioned to award the bid as listed in the procurement letter and a second was given; the board approved the action without additional discussion. The evaluation team had reviewed the bids and presented the recommendation for approval.

What was not specified: the bid opening produced three responsive bids, but the record does not include the full bid forms or the tabulation sheet in the meeting minutes. Procurement stated the award letter contains the detailed line items and amounts; the meeting record includes the letter’s readback but not attachments with vendor addresses or contract terms.

Next steps: procurement will finalize award letters and move to contract execution and delivery under the usual county purchasing procedures.