Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the State Legislation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
California Senate Appropriations Committee moves 79 bills to suspense file after final hearing
Summary
The California State Senate Appropriations Committee moved all 79 measures on its agenda to the suspense file during its final regular-order hearing; authors waived presentations, Department of Finance did not appear, and public testimony was limited to fiscal impacts.
The Senate Committee on Appropriations moved 79 measures on its agenda to the committee's suspense file during a final regular-order hearing held in Room 2200 of the 0 Street Building. Committee members handled each bill as a suspense-file candidate after authors waived presentation and the Department of Finance indicated it had no files for the day's measures.
The action matters because placement on the suspense file sends bills to committee staff for further fiscal review before the committee decides whether to fund or advance them. Chair Powell opened the hearing by noting, "We have 79 measures on today's agenda, all of which are suspense file candidates." He also reminded witnesses to limit testimony to fiscal aspects.
Committee members moved each item to the suspense file without roll-call votes; most motions were handled "without objection." The hearing record shows numerous organizations and local governments testified in support of or opposition to individual bills, but the committee did not take final action on any bill beyond placing it on suspense. Examples from the hearing record include:
- SB 79: Chris McCailey testified on behalf of the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority that LA Metro is a proud cosponsor. Susan Madden (W Strategies, on behalf of California EMB) and Andrew Lawler (student senator, University of California, Santa Barbara) also spoke in support. Representatives of several cities — including Carlsbad, Merced, Rancho Cucamonga and Thousand Oaks — registered respectful opposition through Kobe Poseidon.
- SB 690: Robert Harel, executive director of the Consumer Federation of California, testified in respectful opposition and said the bill "would have the effect of a massive increase retroactively of corporate surveillance and spying powers." Russell Manning spoke as a sponsor or co-sponsor for bills on behalf of California State Treasurer Fiona Ma on other items.
- SB 540: Testimony included support from Silicon Valley Clean Energy and the Silicon Valley Leadership Group and opposition from California for Green Nuclear Power.
Across the agenda, recurring themes in testimony were fiscal impacts, local government interests, industry positions and concerns raised by consumer-advocacy organizations. Committee members routinely noted that authors had waived presentations and that public commenters should confine remarks to fiscal aspects; the Department of Finance was not present to provide fiscal files.
The committee recessed after moving the final listed bill, and Chair Powell closed the hearing and adjourned the meeting. No bill was adopted, amended, or rejected during the hearing; all were referred to suspense for further fiscal consideration.
