Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Board Business topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: Chase County commissioners approve warrants, payroll, transfers and contracts on May 30
Summary
At its May 30 meeting the Chase County Board of Commissioners approved routine warrants, payroll and minutes; approved several transfers of funds and a change order; and authorized the master service agreement with Blue Valley Consulting.
Chase County commissioners conducted routine business May 30 and approved a series of administrative items, transfers and contracts listed below. Most motions were approved by voice vote with no roll-call tallies recorded in the public transcript.
Key actions recorded in the meeting minutes and approved by the board: - Approval of warrants for May 30, 2025 (motion carried by voice vote). - Approval of payroll for May 30, 2025 (motion carried by voice vote). - Approval of minutes from the May 12, 2025 meeting (motion carried by voice vote). - Approval of Change Order 02/2022 (motion carried by voice vote). - Approval of multiple transfers of funds (identified in agenda as 2025-01 through 2025-06), including transfers from jail revenue to grant-writer salary, jail excess revenue to mill-supplement/general fund, detention facility to 2-mil supplement, ambulance capital outlay to ambulance equipment fund, and transfers within the fire department funds. Each transfer was moved, seconded and approved by voice vote; specific line-item details were presented by county staff during the meeting. - Authorization for department staff to execute the master service agreement between Chase County and Blue Valley Consulting, with authority delegated to the county signatory to sign (motion carried by voice vote).
Items discussed but not voted on or deferred: a proposed juvenile-detention contract with Reno County was discussed and the county decided to hold on signing any new juvenile contract until needed; sheriff’s camera procurement was discussed but commissioners recommended budgeting the multi-year payment rather than taking immediate purchasing action.
The meeting included two executive sessions (one for confidential financial data related to a tax protest and one for non-elected personnel matters). Both executive sessions were recorded as having no action taken when the board returned to open session.
