Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Textbooks topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Nash County board approves $1.5 million textbook contracts, subject to attorney review
Summary
The Nash County Public Schools board approved contracts for new K–8 science and K–5 instructional materials totaling about $1.5 million; approval is conditioned on final attorney revisions after vendors sought to remove a termination-for-convenience clause.
Get email alerts on the Education Textbooks topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Nash County Public Schools board approved contracts this month to adopt new instructional materials for K–8 science and K–5 grades, with a total adoption cost of approximately $1,500,000, the superintendent said.
Administrators told the board the vote authorizes final contract signatures but preserves the district's right to complete attorney review. The district said vendors returned redlined contracts requesting changes including removal of a termination-for-convenience clause; the board approved the contracts "subject to further attorney review," Superintendent Ellis said.
District staff and the superintendent said the approval does not change the dollar amounts or the materials selected. Curriculum vendors mentioned in the discussion included Discovery and Curriculum Associates, whose proposed contract language prompted review by district counsel.
Board member Gray moved to approve, and Dunton seconded. The clerk recorded a unanimous voice vote: "Aye," and the chair said the motion carried.
The board and staff said the district intends to negotiate remaining contract language — particularly around termination and payment terms — before executing final agreements. Officials said the contracts were presented after a prior public committee review and vendor redline exchanges.
District staff indicated the adoption follows the state's instructional-material adoption process and that any vendor changes sought to lock the district into multiyear agreements were a central concern.
Officials did not provide a timeline for final contract execution or for when materials will be delivered to schools. The superintendent said attorney review would continue and that core business terms and the materials themselves would not change.

