Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Capital Projects topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council reviews options to finance new fire station; staff proposes mixing fund balance and bonding
Summary
City staff presented a conceptual financing plan for a new fire station, showing scenarios where Payson uses a mix of capital fund balance and debt; financing $6 million of a $10 million project would add roughly $50–$75 per year to a typical home tax bill depending on assessed value and bond terms.
Payson City staff and finance officers presented preliminary budget options for a proposed new fire station during the May 21 work session. The concept plan used a $10 million project estimate and illustrated several financing mixes: using fund balance for a portion of the cost and issuing debt for the remainder.
Staff said Payson currently holds about $11 million in capital fund balance (subject to allocations for other projects such as downtown work) and proposed using part of that balance. One illustrative scenario showed financing $6 million while funding $4 million from fund balance; using 15‑year debt at a sample rate (4.12% — the same rate used for a recent sewer bond example) would produce annual debt service that increases the property tax burden on a $405,000 home by about $56 per year (the same scenario yielded a $69‑per‑year estimate for a $500,000 home). Staff noted the figures were preliminary and depend on certified tax rates and final bond terms.
Councilors discussed options, including increasing the paid portion from fund balance (one councilor favored using $5 million or $6 million from fund balance rather than financing the full $6 million) and the equity argument that growth‑related impact fees should cover some portion of new facilities rather than pushing all costs to existing taxpayers. Staff said a new fire station could improve response times and insurance ratings for some properties, though achieving a lower ISO rating often requires staffing and equipment changes in addition to facility improvements.
Staff recommended beginning design and procuring architectural services so the project can proceed; they said a budget amendment would follow once the council provided a general financing direction. No final financing decision was made at the meeting.
Ending: Staff will return with refined cost estimates, proposed design RFPs and updated fiscal impacts after the county’s certified tax rate is available.
