Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident urges Taft to address overgrown lots and illegal dumping; council outlines reporting channels
Summary
A Taft resident told the council about multiple overgrown and dumped locations he says pose fire risks. The council and city manager described legal constraints but asked the resident to leave a list with the city clerk and explained reporting portals and county contacts.
A Taft resident urged the City Council Tuesday to address overgrown lots, vacant buildings and illegal dumping he said create fire hazards as summer approaches. City officials told him the city will review the locations and directed him to provide a written list to the city clerk.
Cody Lovett told the council he has identified several addresses with overgrown brush, vacant properties and dumping that he believes heighten wildfire risk. "I have a list of locations that are overgrown with trash and debris that it just doesn't need to be there, especially with the warmer months coming up," Lovett said. He said he has called multiple agencies, including city hall and Kern County, seeking cleanup.
City staff and council members acknowledged the concern but explained the city’s ability to act is sometimes limited by jurisdictional boundaries and environmental permitting. City Manager Jones said crews had inspected an alleyway Lovett mentioned and removed debris where the city could, but cautioned that work in some areas (for example, Sandy Creek) required multi‑year permitting and compliance with state environmental rules.
Mayor Pro Tem Josh Bryant and several councilmembers encouraged residents to use the city’s online "Report a Concern" form at cityoftaft.org, which routes submissions to the responsible department head and the city manager. Bryant also gave two county email contacts for issues outside city limits: codecompliance@kerncounty.com and district2@kerncounty.com, which he said will route matters to the new county supervisor’s office for District 2.
Lovett answered that he would leave his list with the city clerk. The mayor confirmed the city would review the submitted addresses and that public works would act "within the bounds of the law" where possible.
No formal motion or council action was taken; the item was handled as public comment and council response. Councilmembers repeatedly thanked Lovett for raising the issue and asked residents to document and report similar concerns so staff can track and respond.
