Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Council Rules And Charter Changes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Charter & Rules committee tightens notice rules, creates law‑department question process and advances municipal modernization language
Summary
The committee approved changes letting councilors opt out of mailed agendas in writing and added a new rule to let members pose questions to the law department; it tabled two competing late‑file proposals and advanced multiple charter amendments related to municipal modernization and consolidation of the treasurer and collector offices.
Get email alerts on the Council Rules And Charter Changes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Holyoke City Council Charter and Rules Committee voted to allow councilors to opt out of routine U.S. mail delivery of regular meeting agendas by notifying the city clerk in writing and to add a new rule permitting a council member, once recognized, to pose a question to the law department during a meeting.
The committee also tabled two competing proposals that would change how “late‑filed” orders are handled — one that would permit posting and limited distribution up to 1 p.m. on the day of a meeting, and another that would ban late files except in “an absolute emergency” and only if no member objects. Committee members said the competing proposals were confusing and warranted further drafting.
The opt‑out change to Rule 4(b) — introduced as Item 2 — will let a council member, by written notice to the clerk, choose not to have the agenda mailed and instead to receive it by electronic mail. Committee members amended the language to preserve mailed copies as the default and to allow personal delivery by the administrative assistant only as a backup when consistent, timely local mail delivery cannot be guaranteed. The motion to adopt that amendment passed by voice vote.
The late‑filed item proposals (Items 3 and 4) drew extended debate. Supporters of a strict ban said late files have been “used and abused” and should be allowed only for clear emergencies; others argued that some late items come from departments that miss internal deadlines and that a narrow, written‑approval process for adding a true late emergency to the published agenda could be appropriate. The committee voted to table both items so staff and members can produce clearer language.
On Item 5 the committee added a proposed Rule 6(h): "Any member of the council, upon being recognized by the president, may pose a question to be answered by the law department." That proposal prompted a lengthy discussion about the law department’s role. Councilor Bacon and others raised concerns about ad‑hoc legal opinions being used during meetings to sway votes or derail debate; other members said access to solicitor advice can be essential when novel legal questions arise. After discussion the committee approved the item as amended to give the council greater access while recognizing concerns about procedural overuse.
The committee also took up a package of municipal modernization proposals (Items 7, 8 and 9) that include ordinance and charter changes to consolidate administrative functions, revise succession language for an unavailable mayor, and combine the treasurer and collector offices. Members amended language for the Soldiers Memorial Commission to substitute a combined “treasurer/collector” reference rather than deleting the treasurer from the commission entirely. They also amended acting‑mayor language to replace the gendered term “his” and to specify that, if the city clerk is unable to act, the duties would pass to the city council president. The committee voted to send amended charter language with a recommendation to the full council and to refer ordinance elements to the Ordinance Committee as needed.
Votes at a glance from this meeting: Item 2 (Rule 4 opt‑out language as amended) — approved; Items 3 and 4 (late‑filed rules) — tabled for redrafting; Item 5 (new Rule 6(h) on law‑department questions) — approved as amended; Item 7 (charter edits for municipal modernization) — forwarded to full council with recommended amendments; Item 8 (copy of municipal modernization ordinance) — marked complied with; Item 9 (treasurer/collector consolidation) — marked complied with with recommendation to refer ordinance matters to Ordinance Committee.
Committee members asked law department staff to prepare revised legal text for the tabled late‑file items and for the acting‑mayor and Soldiers Memorial Commission changes. Several members suggested creating a council parliamentarian role to reduce reliance on ad‑hoc solicitor opinions during meetings. Chair Meg McGrath Smith and other members said the committee will reconvene to finalize the redrafted language.

