Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Wildlife Management topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission discusses predator control and habitat options to bolster pheasant numbers; staff to convene DWR, UDAF and wildlife groups

3808341 · June 2, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission discussed options to boost local pheasant populations, including predator control and habitat enhancement, and directed staff to set up a meeting with the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, UDAF and conservation groups.

Duchesne County commissioners discussed local proposals to increase pheasant populations through predator control or other measures and asked staff to convene a meeting with the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (DWR), Utah Department of Agriculture and Food (UDAF), and wildlife‑conservation groups.

County staff summarized research and conversations with a regional small‑game biologist who reviewed a South Dakota program that targeted nest predators. The biologist told staff that in a large area — such as a county — killing predators at scale typically has little measurable effect on pheasant populations; he suggested that focused work at the level of a neighborhood or a very small area could show localized benefits. The biologist said improving nesting habitat is often the most effective, long‑term strategy.

Commission discussion points included:

- Whether a bounty or targeted removal program could be funded or partnered with private groups (Wildlife Conservation Fund and others were mentioned). - Concerns about non‑target impacts (for example, skunks preying on prairie dogs) and the need to coordinate with DWR on permitted actions and enforcement. - Questions about enforcement and which county entity would take the lead; commissioners suggested economic development or a DWR partnership would be appropriate.

Next steps: commissioners asked staff to schedule a meeting with DWR, UDAF, Wildlife Conservation Fund (WCF) representatives and economic development staff to develop options, review budgets and draft a proposed scope of work. No action was taken at the June 2 meeting.