Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Environmental Justice Pfas Heat topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Omnibus environmental‑justice bill covers PFAS limits, heat‑island grants and retail testing for cosmetic hair products
Summary
Senate Bill 173 combines several environmental‑justice measures — opt‑out disposable foodware, phased restrictions and labeling for some PFAS uses, urban canopy and heat‑island grants, and a narrow retail testing pilot for cosmetic hair products — into one omnibus bill.
Senator Neal presented Senate Bill 173 as an omnibus environmental‑justice and public‑health bill with several discrete components:
- Disposable foodware: A ‘‘skip the extras’’/opt‑out concept for food delivery so consumers do not automatically receive disposable utensils and accessories unless requested. - PFAS (per‑ and polyfluoroalkyl substances): Prohibitions (phased) on intentionally added PFAS in multiple categories such as certain food packaging, juvenile products, carpet, cookware and related products with labeling and exemptions; the sponsor said the approach targets uses where PFAS are unnecessary and exposure risk is greatest and that the bill follows state models elsewhere while phasing and providing implementation timing. - Heat islands and urban canopy: A pilot and grant program to mitigate urban heat‑island effects, including a mechanism for redevelopment authorities to dedicate a small percent of redevelopment funds to plantings and maintenance, and to coordinate seed/seedling selection, monitoring and a grant program using Desert Research Institute technical input. The sponsor said the bill is designed to ensure planted trees are appropriate and survive in local climates. - Cosmetology and formaldehyde testing: The bill includes a narrowly scoped program for testing certain retail hair‑product sales (retail stores that sell hair braids/weaves and chemical hair products) for formaldehyde and other hazardous contaminants; the sponsor described an MOU between Department of Cosmetology and UNR to use university testing capacity. - Microplastics: A limited directive to develop or adopt inspection protocols related to microplastic particles on food preparation surfaces (e.g., plastic cutting boards) for public‑health agencies to evaluate further.
Support came from Sierra Club, environmental‑justice advocates, DRI, university researchers and some public‑health groups; opposition came from the Nevada Manufacturers Association (concerned about PFAS timelines and lack of alternatives for some manufacturing uses) and industry trade groups that sought clarifying amendments on labeling scope. The Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers asked for tighter definitions (remove “without limitation” wording in cookware labelling) to reduce uncertainty.
No committee vote occurred on SB 173 during the hearing day; sponsors said some sections would continue to be negotiated and pointed to available amendments to tighten definitions and timelines.
